Does carbon dating proved evolution
And this big sequence is then used to 'correct' C14 dates. (3.) Even if the rate of decay is constant, without a knowledge of the exact ratio of C12 to C14 in the initial sample, the dating technique is still subject to question.(4.) Traditional 14C testing assumes equilibrium in the rate of formation and the rate of decay.We believe all the dates over 5,000 years are really compressible into the next 2,000 years back to creation.
She says this is ok so long as you take into account the correction factors from dendrochronology.However, just because we accept that dinosaurs exist does not mean we have to accept the theory that they were walking on the Earth millions of years ago.(I will discuss this later) Of course in biblical times, they had different names.“Look now at the behemoth, which I made along with you; he eats grass like an ox.One of the impressive points Whitewall makes is the conspicuous absence of dates between 4,500 and 5,000 years ago illustrating a great catastrophe killing off plant and animal life world wide (the flood of Noah)!I hope this helps your understanding of carbon dating.